Disclaimer: SpendNode is for informational purposes only and is not a financial advisor. Some links on this site are affiliate links - we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This does not affect our data or rankings. Affiliate DisclosureView Policy

COCA vs Ready

Side-by-side comparison of COCA and Ready crypto cards. Data sourced from official issuer documentation and verified by SpendNode.

Comparing 2 Cards

Side-by-side comparison of features and benefits

Attribute
COCA Visa Card
COCA
COCA Visa Card
Ready Metal Card
Ready
Ready Metal Card
Max Cashback
8%Highest
3%
Annual Fee
FreeBest
$120
FX Fee1%0%
Custody ModelCustodialCustodial
NetworkVISAMASTERCARD
Regions
EEAUKAPACLATAMGLOBAL
EEAUK
Supported Assets
4+ assets
USDCUSDTETHBTC
1+ assets
USDC
Cashback
Yes
Yes
Staking
Yes
No
Points
No
No
Airdrops
Yes
No
Lounge access
No
No
Subscription rebates
Yes
No
Metal card
No
Yes
Virtual Cards
No
Yes
Physical Cards
No
Yes
Visa
No
No
Mastercard
No
No
Apple Pay
No
No
Google Pay
No
Yes
Self-custody spend
Yes
Yes
Stablecoin spend
No
Yes
No annual fee
Yes
No
No FX fee
No
Yes
ATM free allowance
No
Yes
No KYC
Yes
No
Virtual vs Physical
No
Yes
Debit vs Prepaid
No
No
Best ForBest for CashbackBest for ATM Access

Note: All data verified as of February 2026. Rewards and fees may vary based on your spending tier and region. Check each card's detailed page for complete terms.

COCA vs Ready: Key Differences

Two [self-custodial](/crypto-cards/self-custody/) debit cards built on different smart contract architectures. [COCA](/crypto-cards/coca-card/) delivers 1-8% [cashback](/crypto-cards/cashback/) with 0-1% FX (0% on direct stablecoin pairs, 1% on indirect), 6% APY, 50% subscription [rebates](/crypto-cards/rebates/), IBAN banking, and coverage in 54 countries on Visa via ERC-4337. [Ready](/crypto-cards/ready-metal-card/) (formerly Argent) offers 0.5-3% cashback in STRK with 0-1% FX fees, Starknet self-custody, USDC-only funding, and availability exclusively in EEA and UK on Mastercard. Both keep your funds in a smart contract wallet you control. COCA wins on economics, features, and reach. Ready wins on simplicity and Starknet ecosystem integration.

The right choice depends on your priorities: cashback rates, regional availability, custody model, and which ecosystem you already use. Below, we break down who should choose each card.

Architecture: ERC-4337 vs Starknet

Both cards use smart contract wallets for genuine self-custody, but on different chains.

COCA - Non-custodial Visa debit, Wirex issuer. Privy smart wallet (ERC-4337/EIP-7702) with biometric recovery. Six tiers by COCA token holding (no staking): Starter (0, 1%) through Elite (30K, 8%). 0% FX on direct stablecoin pairs (EURC to EUR, USDC to USD), 1% on indirect pairs. $0 annual, $250/month ATM. 6% APY on stablecoins. 50% off subscriptions. IBAN + SEPA. 54 countries. Assets: USDC, USDT, ETH, BTC.

Ready - Self-custodial Mastercard debit, formerly Argent. Starknet smart contract wallet with co-signer model. Two tiers: Lite (free, 0.5% STRK, 1% FX) and Metal (120 USDC/year, 3% STRK, 0% FX, 16g metal, $800/month ATM). USDC-only. EEA + UK. Google Pay (Apple Pay coming). Cashback capped at $150/month in STRK ($1,800/year).

Net Returns Comparison

ScenarioCOCA Starter (1%, free)COCA Standard (3%, 300 COCA)COCA Premium (5%, 3K COCA)Ready Lite (0.5%, free, 1% FX)Ready Metal (3%, $120/yr, 0% FX)
Domestic $1K/mo$10$30$50-$5 (0.5% CB - 1% FX)$26 (after $10/mo fee amort.)
Cross-curr. $2K/mo$20$60$100-$30 (0.5% - 1% FX)$50 (after fee amort.)
Annual $3K/mo$360$1,080$1,800-$180 (net loss)$960 (after $120 annual)

Based on SpendNode's full comparison, Ready Lite is a net-negative card on cross-currency spending. The 0.5% cashback minus 1% FX fee = -0.5% net loss on every international transaction. Ready Metal eliminates FX fees and earns 3% - matching COCA Standard on rate but losing on total value once COCA's APY and subscription savings are added.

Ready Metal's $150/month cashback cap matters at higher volumes. On $5,000/month spending (the cap), Metal earns $150/month = $1,800/year. Above $5,000/month, additional spending earns 0%. COCA Standard has caps too (above tier cap, spending earns 1%), but COCA's higher tiers (5-8%) extend the earning range further.

Feature Gap

COCA has that Ready does not:

  • 6% APY on stablecoin balances ($300-600/year on $5K-10K)
  • 50% off five subscription services (approximately $240/year)
  • Personal IBAN with SEPA bank transfers
  • Multi-asset support (USDC, USDT, ETH, BTC vs USDC only)
  • 54 countries (vs EEA/UK only)
  • Six progressive tiers (vs two)
  • Higher cashback ceiling (8% vs 3%)

Ready has that COCA does not:

  • Starknet-native architecture (for Starknet ecosystem users)
  • No ecosystem token required for the card (USDC-only funding, STRK received as cashback)
  • 16g metal card at $120/year (COCA's physical card pricing varies by tier)
  • Established brand (formerly Argent, since 2017)
  • 4.5 App Store rating (2,293 reviews) vs COCA (no App Store listing)
  • Partner perks (Ramp, Layerswap, Koinly, NordVPN discounts)

Mistakes to Avoid

Using Ready Lite for cross-currency European spending when the FX fee makes it a net-loss card. Ready Lite charges 1% FX on non-domestic transactions. With only 0.5% cashback, the net return on cross-currency spending is -0.5% per transaction. A European traveler spending $2,000/month across currencies loses $120/year. Even COCA Starter (free, 1%, 0-1% FX) earns $240/year on the same spending. The gap is $360/year between two free cards. How to avoid it: If you use Ready Lite internationally, upgrade to Metal (0% FX, 3%) for positive returns. If the $120/year fee is too much, COCA Starter (free, 1%, 0-1% FX) delivers more value with zero commitment.

Dismissing Ready Metal because COCA has more features, without considering the simplicity advantage. COCA requires buying and holding COCA tokens for tiers above 1%. Ready Metal requires only $120/year in USDC - no token purchase, no price monitoring, no ecosystem bet. For users who want a straightforward self-custodial card at 3% with no token exposure beyond receiving STRK as cashback, Ready Metal is the simpler product. The $120 annual fee is predictable and denominated in USDC (no volatility). COCA's 3% tier requires holding 300 COCA tokens whose dollar value fluctuates. How to avoid it: Compare total risk-adjusted returns. If the COCA token maintains value, COCA Standard offers more total value. If you prefer zero token risk and pure simplicity, Ready Metal's $120/year for 3% + 0% FX + metal + self-custody is a strong package.

Quick Verdict

For maximum returns from self-custodial spending: COCA at Standard (3%) or above. Higher cashback ceiling, 6% APY, subscription savings, and IBAN banking deliver $600+ more annual value than Ready Metal.

For simple, no-token self-custodial spending in Europe: Ready Metal at $120/year. 3% STRK cashback, 0% FX, metal card, and no ecosystem token required. Clean and predictable.

For free self-custodial entry: COCA Starter (1%, 0-1% FX, 54 countries) versus Ready Lite (0.5%, 1% FX, EEA/UK). COCA still wins on cashback rate and geographic reach, though both now charge 1% FX on indirect pairs.

For Starknet ecosystem users: Ready integrates natively with Starknet. If you hold STRK or build on Starknet, Ready keeps you within the ecosystem.

Outlook: COCA's feature density at zero subscription cost puts pressure on Ready's simpler two-tier model. If Ready expands beyond EEA/UK, adds more assets (ETH, BTC), or increases cashback tiers, it becomes more competitive. If COCA builds Starknet support or Ready-style simplicity, the geographic and feature gaps narrow. Watch for Ready's expansion roadmap and COCA's app reliability as the key variables. For European users, both cards work well as a pair: Ready for daily USDC spending simplicity, COCA for cashback optimization and banking.

Fee Breakdown

FeeCOCAReady
FX Fee1%0%
Annual FeeFree$120
ATM Fee0%2%

Fees pulled from issuer documentation. Verify on the official site before applying.

Who Should Choose COCA

The COCA Visa Card is best suited for users who:

  • Want up to 8% cashback on spending
  • Prefer a card with no annual fee
  • Are based in EEA, UK, APAC, LATAM, GLOBAL

Who Should Choose Ready

The Ready Metal Card is best suited for users who:

  • Want up to 3% cashback on spending
  • Need zero FX fees for international transactions
  • Are based in EEA, UK

Our Verdict

**SpendNode compared both self-custodial cards: COCA delivers 2-3x more cashback, adds APY and subscription savings, covers 10x more countries, and charges 0-1% FX - making it the stronger financial choice at every tier.** On $3,000/month spending, COCA Standard (3%, 0-1% FX) earns $1,080/year with no subscription. Ready Metal (3%, 0% FX, 120 USDC/year) earns $1,080/year minus $120 = $960/year net (capped at $150/month STRK = $1,800/year max). At the uncapped comparison, both earn 3% - but COCA adds 6% APY ($300/year on $5K), 50% subscription savings ($240/year), and IBAN banking that Ready cannot match. Total annual value: COCA approximately $1,620 versus Ready approximately $960. Ready's advantages are narrow but real: Starknet-native architecture for users already in that ecosystem, USDC-only simplicity (no token purchase needed for the card itself), and a 16g metal card at $120/year. For EEA/UK users who want the simplest self-custodial card with no ecosystem token required, Ready Metal is a clean choice. For maximum value, COCA wins.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has better cashback, COCA or Ready?

COCA offers up to 8% cashback compared to Ready's 3%. Actual rates depend on your spending tier and card variant.

Which card has lower fees?

Ready charges 0% FX fee vs COCA's 1%. COCA has no annual fee while Ready charges $120.

Is COCA or Ready better for self-custody?

Both use custodial models. If self-custody is important, consider providers like Gnosis Pay or ether.fi.

Which card is available in more regions?

COCA is available in 5 regions (EEA, UK, APAC, LATAM, GLOBAL) compared to Ready's 2 regions (EEA, UK). Always verify eligibility on the issuer's website.

How we compare

Related Comparisons

Last verified: Feb 27, 2026 · Data sourced from official COCA and Ready documentation. · Methodology