Disclaimer: SpendNode is for informational purposes only and is not a financial advisor. Some links on this site are affiliate links - we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This does not affect our data or rankings. Affiliate DisclosureView Policy

COCA vs Crypto.com

Side-by-side comparison of COCA and Crypto.com crypto cards. Data sourced from official issuer documentation and verified by SpendNode.

Comparing 2 Cards

Side-by-side comparison of features and benefits

Attribute
COCA Visa Card
COCA
COCA Visa Card
Prime
Crypto.com
Prime
Max Cashback
8%Highest
8%Highest
Annual Fee
FreeBest
TBD
FX Fee1%0%
Custody ModelCustodialCustodial
NetworkVISAVISA
Regions
EEAUKAPACLATAMGLOBAL
GLOBAL
Supported Assets
4+ assets
USDCUSDTETHBTC
6+ assets
USDCROBTCETHUSDTUSDC
Cashback
Yes
Yes
Staking
Yes
Yes
Points
No
No
Airdrops
Yes
No
Lounge access
No
Yes
Subscription rebates
Yes
Yes
Metal card
No
Yes
Virtual Cards
No
No
Physical Cards
No
No
Visa
No
No
Mastercard
No
No
Apple Pay
No
No
Google Pay
No
No
Self-custody spend
Yes
No
Stablecoin spend
No
No
No annual fee
Yes
No
No FX fee
No
Yes
ATM free allowance
No
No
No KYC
Yes
No
Virtual vs Physical
No
No
Debit vs Prepaid
No
No
Best ForBest for CashbackBest for Cashback

Note: All data verified as of February 2026. Rewards and fees may vary based on your spending tier and region. Check each card's detailed page for complete terms.

COCA vs Crypto.com: Key Differences

The most feature-dense newcomer in crypto cards versus the most established lifestyle ecosystem. [COCA](/crypto-cards/coca-card/) delivers 1-8% [cashback](/crypto-cards/cashback/) across six tiers with 0-1% FX (0% on direct stablecoin pairs, 1% on indirect), 6% APY on stablecoin balances, 50% subscription [rebates](/crypto-cards/rebates/), a personal IBAN, and non-custodial [self-custody](/crypto-cards/self-custody/) - all without staking or lock-ups. [Crypto.com](/crypto-cards/crypto-com/) counters with its own six-tier system (0-8%), 100% Spotify and Netflix rebates, airport [lounges](/crypto-cards/lounges/), metal cards, and a seven-year track record with 4.7 App Store stars. Both require holding a native token (COCA vs CRO). The architecture of that token commitment is where these cards diverge most sharply.

The right choice depends on your priorities: cashback rates, regional availability, custody model, and which ecosystem you already use. Below, we break down who should choose each card.

Six Tiers vs Six Tiers: Architecture Comparison

Both programs use six tiers activated by native token commitment. The mechanism differs fundamentally.

COCA tiers activate by wallet balance - hold COCA tokens, no staking or lock-ups required. If your balance drops below the threshold, benefits stay active for 30 days before downgrading. Non-custodial Visa debit issued by Wirex. Personal IBAN with SEPA. Apple Pay. 54 countries (EEA, UK, APAC, LATAM). Assets: USDC, USDT, ETH, BTC.

  • Starter: 0 COCA, 1% cashback
  • Standard: 300 COCA, 3%
  • Standard+: 1,000 COCA, 4%
  • Premium: 3,000 COCA, 5%
  • Premium+: 10,000 COCA, 6%
  • Elite: 30,000 COCA, 8%

All tiers: 0% FX on direct stablecoin pairs (EURC/EURS to EUR, USDC/USDT to USD), 1% on indirect pairs. $0 annual fee, $250/month free ATM, 6% APY on stablecoin balances (up to tier cap, 2% above), 50% off Netflix/Spotify/ChatGPT/Amazon Prime/Apple Music. Above monthly cashback tier cap, spending earns 1%.

Crypto.com tiers activate by CRO staking (12-month lock-up) or monthly subscription. Custodial Visa prepaid. Global availability. Assets: USD, CRO, BTC, ETH, USDT, USDC.

  • Basic (Midnight Blue): $0, 0% cashback, $200/month free ATM
  • Plus (Ruby Steel): $4.99/month or $500 CRO stake, 2%, $25/month cap, 100% Spotify, $400/month ATM
  • Pro (Royal Indigo/Jade Green): $29.99/month or $5,000 CRO stake, 3%, $75/month cap, Spotify+Netflix+Truth+, 4 lounge visits/year, $800/month ATM
  • Private (Icy White/Rose Gold): $50,000 CRO stake, 4% uncapped, unlimited lounges + guest, $1,000/month ATM
  • Private (Obsidian): $500,000 CRO stake, 5% uncapped, private jet perks
  • Prime: $1,000,000 CRO stake, 8% uncapped, private account manager, 15% travel rewards (coming 2026)

All tiers: 0% FX (Crypto.com retains 0% across all currencies). Plus and Pro cashback caps reset monthly.

Net Returns: Tier-by-Tier Comparison

Tier LevelCOCA (rate, requirement)CdC (rate, requirement)COCA annual on $3K/moCdC annual on $3K/mo
FreeStarter (1%, 0 COCA)Basic (0%, free)$360$0
EntryStandard (3%, 300 COCA)Plus (2%, $5/mo or $500 CRO)$1,080$240 (after $60 sub, capped)
MidPremium (5%, 3K COCA)Pro (3%, $30/mo or $5K CRO)$1,800$540 (after $360 sub, capped)
HighElite (8%, 30K COCA)Private (4%, $50K CRO)$2,880$1,440 (uncapped)
UltraElite (8%, 30K COCA)Obsidian (5%, $500K CRO)$2,880$1,800 (uncapped)
ApexElite (8%, 30K COCA)Prime (8%, $1M CRO)$2,880$2,880 (uncapped)

At entry level, COCA Standard earns 4.5x more than Crypto.com Plus on $3,000/month spending. COCA's 3% generates $1,080/year with no subscription fee. CdC's 2% generates $300/year gross but caps at $25/month ($300/year) minus $60 subscription = $240/year net. The $840/year gap at entry tier is the largest in any crypto card comparison on SpendNode.

At mid-tier, COCA Premium earns 3.3x more. COCA's 5% on $3,000/month = $1,800/year (assuming no cap hit). CdC's 3% caps at $75/month = $900/year gross minus $360 subscription = $540/year net.

Crypto.com only matches COCA at the apex: both earn 8% uncapped at Prime/Elite. But CdC Prime requires $1,000,000 in CRO locked for 12 months. COCA Elite requires holding 30,000 COCA with no lock-up.

Beyond Cashback: APY, Rebates, and Banking

Three areas where these cards offer value beyond cashback rates.

Yield on idle balances. COCA earns 6% APY on stablecoin balances via Morpho + Gauntlet (DeFi lending), with 2% above tier cap. A $10,000 USDC balance earns $600/year. Crypto.com offers no comparable passive yield on card balances. CdC's DeFi ecosystem exists separately but is not integrated into the card program.

Subscription rebates. COCA offers 50% off Netflix, Spotify, ChatGPT, Amazon Prime, and Apple Music at all tiers. Combined savings: approximately $240/year at full price. Crypto.com offers 100% Spotify rebate at Plus ($156/year), 100% Spotify + Netflix + Truth+ at Pro (approximately $348/year). CdC's rebates are deeper (100% vs 50%) but available only at paid tiers. COCA's 50% applies from Starter (free).

Banking features. COCA provides a personal IBAN with SEPA transfers for EUR banking - receive salary, send/receive money. Crypto.com does not offer IBAN banking. For European users who want a single app for both crypto spending and euro banking, COCA fills a gap CdC cannot.

Token Exposure: Hold vs Lock

The critical structural difference between these programs.

COCA requires holding, not staking. Your COCA tokens stay in your non-custodial wallet. You can sell them at any time - your tier benefits remain active for 30 days after your balance drops below the threshold. There is no lock-up period. You maintain full liquidity.

Crypto.com requires staking with a 12-month lock-up (at Private and above). At Plus and Pro, the subscription alternative ($4.99/month or $29.99/month) avoids CRO lock-up entirely - but at Private ($50,000 CRO) through Prime ($1,000,000 CRO), there is no subscription option. CRO must be locked for 12 months with no early exit.

The risk calculation is different. If COCA token drops 50%, you lose 50% of your token value but can sell immediately and downgrade your tier. If CRO drops 50% during a $50,000 Private lockup, you lose $25,000 with no ability to exit for up to 12 months. CRO's history illustrates this: it peaked at $0.90 in late 2021 and traded between $0.05-0.15 throughout 2024-2025. A Private stake made near peak would have lost over $47,000 in locked value.

Neither token is risk-free. COCA is a newer token with less price history and lower liquidity than CRO. CRO has seven years of price data but extreme volatility. The subscription route at CdC Plus/Pro ($60-360/year) eliminates token risk entirely - an option COCA does not need to offer because its hold-not-stake model already provides liquidity.

Custody: Non-Custodial vs Custodial

COCA is non-custodial. Your funds sit in a smart contract wallet (Privy, ERC-4337/EIP-7702) with biometric recovery. You hold the keys. If COCA the company shuts down, your wallet assets remain accessible. The card issuer is Wirex (FCA-regulated UK, licensed EEA).

Crypto.com is fully custodial. Your funds sit on Crypto.com's servers. If Crypto.com faces a hack, regulatory action, or insolvency, your balances could be frozen. Crypto.com has operated since 2016 with no major security incident to its card program, holds multiple regulatory licenses globally, and has passed Proof of Reserves audits. The 4.7 App Store rating across 323,000 reviews reflects strong user trust.

For users who prioritize self-custody after FTX/Celsius/Voyager, COCA's non-custodial model eliminates counterparty risk. For users who prioritize platform stability and support recovery, Crypto.com's seven-year operational history provides confidence that custodial alternatives cannot replicate overnight.

Mistakes to Avoid

Comparing COCA's top rate (8%) to Crypto.com's accessible rate (2-3%) without checking the token commitment required for each. COCA Elite requires 30,000 COCA tokens. At current prices, this can represent a significant investment. Crypto.com Plus requires only $500 in CRO (or $4.99/month subscription with zero token risk). A user who buys 30,000 COCA to chase 8% is making a larger capital commitment than a CdC Plus subscriber paying $60/year. The fair comparison is at the same commitment level: COCA Standard (300 COCA) vs CdC Plus ($500 CRO or $60/year) - and at that level, COCA's 3% with no fees still beats CdC's capped 2%. How to avoid it: Compare tiers at similar capital commitment, not headline rates. COCA wins at every equivalent commitment level, but the gap narrows at higher tiers where CdC's lifestyle perks add non-cashback value.

Choosing Crypto.com Pro for 3% cashback without calculating the effective rate after caps and subscription. Pro caps cashback at $75/month ($900/year). The $360/year subscription reduces net cashback to $540/year on any spending volume. On $3,000/month, the effective rate is 1.5% ($540 / $36,000), not 3%. A user who does not value Spotify, Netflix, or lounges pays $360/year for a 1.5% effective card. COCA Premium (5%) with no subscription earns $1,800/year on the same spending - 3.3x more. The CdC Pro subscription only makes financial sense if you actively use the streaming rebates ($348/year value) and lounge visits ($160/year value), which together exceed the subscription cost. How to avoid it: Calculate your effective rate: (annual cashback minus annual subscription) divided by annual spending. If you use all streaming rebates and lounges, CdC Pro's total value ($540 cashback + $348 rebates + $160 lounges = $1,048) competes with COCA Premium ($1,800 cashback + $300 APY on $5K = $2,100). If you use none of the perks, COCA is the clear winner.

Quick Verdict

For maximum financial returns with self-custody: COCA at any tier level. Higher cashback rates, 6% APY, no subscription fees, no lock-ups, personal IBAN. COCA Standard (300 COCA, 3%) delivers more net value than CdC Plus at a fraction of the ongoing cost.

For lifestyle perks and brand trust: Crypto.com Pro with the streaming rebates and lounge access. If you already pay for Spotify and Netflix, the rebates effectively make the subscription free - and everything earned from cashback becomes profit. Seven-year track record matters.

For zero-commitment entry: COCA Starter (free, 1%) beats CdC Basic (free, 0%) on returns. Both are zero-risk starting points.

For high-net-worth users: COCA Elite (30,000 COCA, 8% + 6% APY) versus CdC Private ($50,000 CRO, 4% uncapped + lounges + metal). COCA wins on raw economics. CdC wins on premium experience.

Outlook: COCA's feature density at zero subscription cost pressures Crypto.com's mid-tier economics (Plus and Pro). If COCA builds the app reliability, customer support, and brand recognition to match its feature set, it becomes the strongest pure-value card in crypto. Crypto.com's moat is trust, perks, and seven years of delivery - plus the upcoming 15% travel rewards at higher tiers in 2026. Watch for COCA's App Store launch and user reviews as a signal of real-world reliability. The best dual strategy for European users: COCA for daily cashback and banking (IBAN + APY), Crypto.com Pro for streaming rebates and lounge access.

Fee Breakdown

FeeCOCACrypto.com
FX Fee1%0%
Annual FeeFreeTBD
ATM Fee0%TBD

Fees pulled from issuer documentation. Verify on the official site before applying.

Who Should Choose COCA

The COCA Visa Card is best suited for users who:

  • Want up to 8% cashback on spending
  • Prefer a card with no annual fee
  • Are based in EEA, UK, APAC, LATAM, GLOBAL

Who Should Choose Crypto.com

The Prime is best suited for users who:

  • Want up to 8% cashback on spending
  • Need zero FX fees for international transactions
  • Are based in GLOBAL

Our Verdict

**COCA delivers more raw financial value at every accessible tier level, while Crypto.com wins on lifestyle perks, brand trust, and track record.** At the mid-tier level, COCA Standard (300 COCA, 3%) outearns Crypto.com Plus (2%, capped at $25/month) while costing nothing in subscription fees. On $3,000/month spending, COCA Standard earns $1,080/year. Crypto.com Plus earns $240/year after its $60 annual subscription (and cashback caps at $1,250/month spending). Add COCA's 6% APY on a $5,000 stablecoin balance ($300/year) and 50% subscription savings (approx. $120/year), and COCA's annual value reaches $1,500 versus $396 for Crypto.com Plus (including Spotify rebate). At the premium level, COCA Elite (30,000 COCA, 8%) matches Crypto.com Prime (8%, $1,000,000 CRO stake) on rate - but COCA requires no staking, no lock-up, and no subscription fee. Crypto.com's counter-advantages are real: 100% streaming rebates (vs 50%), airport lounges, metal cards, a proven seven-year program, and the strongest brand recognition in crypto cards. For users who value returns and self-custody, COCA wins. For users who value lifestyle perks and an established platform, Crypto.com wins.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has better cashback, COCA or Crypto.com?

Both offer up to 8% cashback. The difference comes down to reward currency, spending caps, and eligibility.

Which card has lower fees?

Crypto.com charges 0% FX fee vs COCA's 1%.

Is COCA or Crypto.com better for self-custody?

Both use custodial models. If self-custody is important, consider providers like Gnosis Pay or ether.fi.

Which card is available in more regions?

COCA is available in 5 regions (EEA, UK, APAC, LATAM, GLOBAL) compared to Crypto.com's 1 region (GLOBAL). Always verify eligibility on the issuer's website.

How we compare

Related Comparisons

Last verified: Feb 27, 2026 · Data sourced from official COCA and Crypto.com documentation. · Methodology