Disclaimer: SpendNode is for informational purposes only and is not a financial advisor. Some links on this site are affiliate links - we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This does not affect our data or rankings. Affiliate DisclosureView Policy
Crypto News

Fidelity Tells the SEC That Broker-Dealers Need a Crypto Trading Framework Now

Updated: Mar 23, 2026By SpendNode Editorial

Key Analysis

Fidelity's general counsel asks the SEC to let broker-dealers trade crypto on alternative trading systems and issue DLT guidance for tokenized securities.

Fidelity Tells the SEC That Broker-Dealers Need a Crypto Trading Framework Now

Fidelity Investments, the third-largest asset manager in the United States, sent a letter to the SEC on March 22 urging the regulator to build a full framework that lets broker-dealers custody, trade, and offer crypto assets on alternative trading systems. The letter, signed by General Counsel Roberto Braceras, responded to a call for comments issued earlier this month by the SEC's Crypto Task Force.

The request goes beyond what most institutional players have asked for publicly. Fidelity wants the SEC to address tokenized securities, distributed ledger technology for recordkeeping, and the regulatory gap between centralized exchanges and decentralized protocols.

What Fidelity Is Asking For

The letter makes three concrete demands.

First, the SEC should create clear rules for broker-dealers to trade tokenized securities issued by third parties on ATS platforms. Current regulations were written for traditional equity and fixed-income instruments. Tokenized assets break assumptions baked into those rules because their structures vary widely. As Braceras wrote, "In some models, the crypto asset represents a holder's indirect interest in the underlying security through a securities entitlement, while in others, the crypto asset may constitute a securities-based swap."

Second, the SEC should issue guidance explicitly permitting broker-dealers to use distributed ledger technology for ATS operations and recordkeeping. This would remove a gray area that has kept many traditional firms from integrating blockchain infrastructure into their compliance workflows.

Third, the SEC should "consider how intermediated and disintermediated trading venues can evolve and coexist." In plain terms: figure out how DeFi fits into the existing regulatory architecture before the gap between on-chain and off-chain trading becomes unmanageable.

Why a $5.8 Trillion Asset Manager Is Pushing This

Fidelity is not a newcomer to crypto. The firm launched its Digital Assets subsidiary in 2018, runs a spot Bitcoin ETF (FBTC), and has been offering crypto custody to institutional clients for years. But its existing crypto infrastructure operates in a regulatory patchwork. Each new product requires bespoke legal interpretation because the SEC has not published a unified framework for how broker-dealers should handle digital assets.

The timing matters. The SEC's Crypto Task Force, led by Commissioner Hester Peirce, opened its request for information on national securities exchanges and alternative trading systems trading crypto assets in December 2025. Fidelity's response lands during a period of accelerating institutional activity. Morgan Stanley filed to launch the first spot Bitcoin ETF from a US bank earlier this month, and Coinbase tokenized its Bitcoin yield fund on Base using the ERC-3643 standard with Apex Group as transfer agent.

The letter also arrives as the SEC and CFTC have begun classifying crypto assets into digital commodity and security buckets, and as the CFTC has started telling futures brokers how to accept crypto as collateral. Fidelity's letter suggests the firm sees a narrow window to influence how the rules get written.

The DeFi Question No One Has Answered

The most pointed part of Fidelity's letter concerns decentralized finance. Braceras argued that the SEC's existing reporting requirements cannot be applied to DeFi platforms because those platforms lack a central authority capable of producing detailed financial reports. Rather than ignoring DeFi or banning it, Fidelity wants the SEC to build a parallel framework.

This is a significant position from a $5.8 trillion traditional finance firm. Most institutional comment letters stick to asking for clarity on tokenized securities and custody. Fidelity is asking the SEC to acknowledge that decentralized venues are a permanent feature of the market and to regulate them accordingly.

The real-world asset angle is equally broad. Fidelity's letter notes that tokenized RWAs now span equities, real estate, bonds, and private credit. Each asset class creates different custody, trading, and reporting obligations. Without a unified framework, broker-dealers either avoid these markets entirely or operate under legal uncertainty that exposes them to enforcement risk.

What Happens Next

The SEC's Crypto Task Force will compile responses from Fidelity and other commenters before issuing recommendations. No timeline has been set for final rulemaking. Commissioner Peirce has been publicly supportive of expanding crypto access through existing market infrastructure, but the full commission has not signaled whether it will move quickly.

For crypto card users and retail holders, the downstream effects are indirect but meaningful. If broker-dealers get a clear ATS framework, more crypto assets could become accessible through traditional brokerage accounts. Tokenized securities traded on regulated venues could eventually feed into payment and spending products, connecting the institutional pipeline to the consumer layer.

As of March 23, 2026, BTC trades at $67,586 (-2.0% in 24 hours), ETH at $2,041 (-2.3%), and the Fear and Greed Index sits at 25, firmly in "Fear" territory. The market is not reacting to Fidelity's letter specifically, but the regulatory groundwork being laid now will determine how the next cycle's institutional capital flows into crypto.

Overview

Fidelity's general counsel sent a letter to the SEC on March 22 requesting a comprehensive framework for broker-dealers to trade crypto assets on alternative trading systems. The letter calls for clear rules on tokenized securities, DLT-based recordkeeping guidance, and a regulatory bridge between centralized and decentralized trading venues. It responds to the SEC Crypto Task Force's December 2025 request for information and lands alongside a wave of institutional crypto products from Morgan Stanley, Coinbase, and others.

Recommended Reading

Frequently Asked Questions

What is an alternative trading system (ATS)?

An ATS is a non-exchange trading venue regulated by the SEC under Regulation ATS. It matches buyers and sellers of securities but does not register as a national securities exchange. Dark pools and electronic communication networks are common examples.

Does Fidelity already trade crypto?

Yes. Fidelity Digital Assets provides custody and execution services for institutional clients, and the firm operates a spot Bitcoin ETF (FBTC). The letter is asking for broader permissions for broker-dealers across the industry, not just Fidelity.

When will the SEC act on this?

No timeline has been announced. The Crypto Task Force is still collecting public comments. Rulemaking could take months or years depending on the commission's priorities.

DisclaimerThis article is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. All fee, limit, and reward data is based on issuer-published documentation as of the date of verification.

Have a question or update?

Discuss this analysis with the community on X.

Discuss on X

Comments

Comments are moderated and may take a moment to appear.