Crypto.com vs MetaMask
Side-by-side comparison of Crypto.com and MetaMask crypto cards. Data sourced from official issuer documentation and verified by SpendNode.
Comparing 2 Cards
Side-by-side comparison of features and benefits
| Attribute | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Max Cashback | 8%Highest | 3% |
| Annual Fee | TBD | TBD |
| FX Fee | 0% | 0% |
| Custody Model | Custodial | Custodial |
| Network | VISA | MASTERCARD |
| Regions | GLOBAL | USEEAUKGLOBAL |
| Supported Assets | 6+ assets USDCROBTCETHUSDTUSDC | 9+ assets USDCUSDTwETHEUReGBPemUSDamUSDaUSDCaBasUSDC |
| Cashback | Yes | Yes |
| Staking | Yes | No |
| Points | No | Yes |
| Airdrops | No | Yes |
| Lounge access | Yes | No |
| Subscription rebates | Yes | No |
| Metal card | Yes | Yes |
| Virtual Cards | No | No |
| Physical Cards | No | No |
| Visa | No | No |
| Mastercard | No | No |
| Apple Pay | No | Yes |
| Google Pay | No | Yes |
| Self-custody spend | No | Yes |
| Stablecoin spend | No | No |
| No annual fee | No | No |
| No FX fee | Yes | Yes |
| ATM free allowance | No | No |
| No KYC | No | Yes |
| Virtual vs Physical | No | No |
| Debit vs Prepaid | No | No |
| Best For | Best for Cashback | Best for Airdrops |
Note: All data verified as of February 2026. Rewards and fees may vary based on your spending tier and region. Check each card's detailed page for complete terms.
Crypto.com vs MetaMask: Key Differences
Crypto's oldest tiered premium card versus its newest [self-custodial](/crypto-cards/self-custody/) Web3 card - two fundamentally different philosophies of what a crypto card should be. [Crypto.com](/crypto-cards/crypto-com/) offers a lifestyle ecosystem with up to 8% [cashback](/crypto-cards/cashback/), Spotify/Netflix [rebates](/crypto-cards/rebates/), airport [lounges](/crypto-cards/lounges/), and metal cards behind CRO staking or subscription gates. [MetaMask](/crypto-cards/metamask-virtual-card/) offers self-custodial spending from your own wallet with 1% cashback (3% Metal, waitlist), zero fees, zero subscriptions, and [airdrop](/crypto-cards/airdrops/) eligibility via Rewards points across 50+ countries. Both charge [0% FX](/crypto-cards/no-fx-fee/). The question: are lifestyle perks worth the subscription cost and custodial trade-off?
The right choice depends on your priorities: cashback rates, regional availability, custody model, and which ecosystem you already use. Below, we break down who should choose each card.
Custody Divide: Exchange vs Self-Sovereignty
Every dollar loaded onto a Crypto.com card sits in Crypto.com's custodial infrastructure. They hold your funds, process transactions, and control access. MetaMask keeps funds in your personal wallet on Linea, Base, or Solana until the exact moment of purchase - genuine self-custody with no exchange counterparty risk.
This matters in crisis scenarios. If an exchange freezes withdrawals (as FTX, Celsius, and others have done), custodial cardholders lose access to their card balance. MetaMask cardholders retain full wallet control at all times - the card feature simply stops working, but the funds remain yours. For users who experienced the 2022 exchange collapses, this distinction alone can decide the comparison.
MetaMask earns 1 Rewards point per $1 spent in addition to cashback. Season 1 distributed $LINEA tokens to active cardholders. Future seasons may distribute tokens from Base, Solana, or other partner ecosystems. Crypto.com offers no airdrop program - its rewards are purely defined CRO cashback and streaming rebates.
Both charge 0% FX fees. Crypto.com operates on Visa. MetaMask operates on Mastercard. Both support Apple Pay and Google Pay.
Net Returns: Subscription Costs vs Free Tier
Both cards charge 0% FX, making fee comparison irrelevant. The difference is subscription costs, cashback caps, and perk value.
| Scenario | MetaMask Virtual (1%, free) | MetaMask Metal (3%, free, waitlist) | CdC Plus (2%, $5/mo, $25 cap) | CdC Pro (3%, $30/mo, $75 cap) | CdC Pro + Perks |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Casual ($1,000/mo) | $10 | $30 | $15 (after sub) | $0 (after sub) | $43 (with Spotify+Netflix) |
| Active ($2,000/mo) | $20 | $60 | $20 (cap, after sub) | $30 (after sub) | $73 (with perks) |
| Power ($3,000/mo) | $30 | $90 | $20 (cap, after sub) | $45 (after sub) | $88 (with perks) |
| Annual ($3,000/mo) | $360 + points | $1,080 + points | $240 (cap, after sub) | $540 (after sub) | $1,048 (with all perks) |
SpendNode's 2026 comparison reflects a counterintuitive result: MetaMask Virtual's uncapped 1% beats CdC Plus's capped 2% above $2,000/month. Plus caps at $25/month ($300/year). After the $60/year subscription, Plus nets $240/year. MetaMask earns $360/year with no cap, no subscription - $120/year more on pure cashback.
CdC Pro's total value (cashback + perks) exceeds MetaMask Virtual but not MetaMask Metal. Pro at $3,000/month earns $540/year in cashback (after $360 subscription). Add Spotify ($156), Netflix ($192), and 4 lounge visits ($160) = approximately $1,048/year total. MetaMask Virtual's $360 + points is lower. MetaMask Metal's $1,080 + points slightly exceeds Pro's total - but Metal is waitlist-only.
The key insight: Crypto.com's value is front-loaded in perks, not cashback. At Pro tier, $508/year of the $1,048 total comes from lifestyle perks. A user who does not use Spotify, Netflix, or airport lounges gets only $540/year - below MetaMask Virtual's $360 + potentially meaningful airdrop value.
Lifestyle Perks: Crypto.com's Unique Moat
MetaMask cannot match these features at any tier:
Plus ($4.99/mo or $500 CRO): 100% Spotify rebate worth $156/year. The rebate alone exceeds the $60/year subscription, making Plus effectively free for Spotify users. 2% cashback capped at $25/month.
Pro ($29.99/mo or $5,000 CRO): 100% Spotify + Netflix + Truth+ rebates (approximately $360-480/year). Airport lounge access (4 visits/year for annual subscribers). Metal card. 3% cashback capped at $75/month.
Private ($50,000 CRO, 4% uncapped): Unlimited lounge access. All streaming rebates. Priority support.
Obsidian ($500,000 CRO, 5%): Guest lounge access. Private jet partnerships. Luxury concierge.
Prime ($1,000,000 CRO, 8%): The most expensive crypto card tier in existence. All perks plus maximum cashback.
Crypto.com is also rolling out up to 15% travel rewards at higher tiers in 2026, which could further strengthen its position for frequent travelers.
MetaMask's counter-advantages: Self-custody (no exchange risk), low KYC onboarding, 9 spendable assets across Linea/Base/Solana including Aave-wrapped yield-bearing tokens, and Rewards points with airdrop potential. No subscription, no staking, no commitment. Available immediately.
Geographic Coverage
Crypto.com is available globally across all regions - one of the broadest coverage footprints of any crypto card. MetaMask serves 50+ countries including the US, EEA, and UK.
Both have extensive overlap. For most major markets (US, Europe, UK), both are available. Crypto.com may cover additional smaller markets where MetaMask is not yet available.
Common Pitfalls
Subscribing to Crypto.com Pro for cashback without valuing the lifestyle perks. Pro's $29.99/month subscription ($360/year) is justified by Spotify ($156) + Netflix ($192) + lounge access ($160) = approximately $508/year in perk value. A user who already pays for Spotify and Netflix gets Pro effectively for free (perk value exceeds subscription cost). But a user who does not use these services pays $360/year for $540/year in capped cashback on $3,000/month - a net of only $180/year, below MetaMask Virtual's free $360/year. How to avoid it: Before subscribing to Pro, calculate whether you genuinely use the perks. If you pay for Spotify and Netflix, Pro is excellent value regardless of spending volume. If not, MetaMask Virtual's free 1% uncapped delivers more net value.
Assuming MetaMask's 1% cannot compete with Crypto.com's higher rates without considering caps and subscriptions. At $3,000/month spending: MetaMask Virtual earns $360/year (free). CdC Plus earns $240/year (after $60 sub, hit $25/mo cap). MetaMask actually beats Plus by $120/year at higher spending volumes because Plus's cap limits growth. CdC Pro earns $540/year (after $360 sub) - $180 more than MetaMask in cashback, but requires 12x the annual cost to achieve. When MetaMask's airdrop potential is included, the gap narrows further. How to avoid it: Compare total costs, not just cashback rates. Factor in subscription costs and caps. MetaMask's zero-cost, uncapped model becomes increasingly competitive as spending rises above $2,000/month versus Crypto.com's capped tiers.
Which One to Pick
For DeFi-native users who prioritize self-custody: MetaMask Virtual with 1% free cashback, zero custody risk, and airdrop potential. The simplest, cheapest path to crypto card rewards.
For Spotify/Netflix users who want maximum total value: Crypto.com Pro with streaming rebates that effectively pay for the subscription, plus lounge access and 3% cashback. Total value approximately $1,048/year on $3,000/month.
For cost-conscious spenders above $2,000/month: MetaMask Virtual's uncapped 1% beats CdC Plus's capped 2% after subscriptions. MetaMask Metal at 3% (when available) beats Pro on pure cashback.
For high-net-worth users wanting premium lifestyle: Crypto.com Private/Obsidian with unlimited lounges, concierge, and 4-5% uncapped cashback. No MetaMask equivalent exists.
For users outside Crypto.com's ecosystem: MetaMask requires no exchange account, no CRO staking, no monthly subscription. Available in 50+ countries with immediate onboarding.
Outlook: Crypto.com's upcoming travel rewards (up to 15% at higher tiers) could further widen its lifestyle advantage for frequent travelers. MetaMask Metal availability expanding to all users would create a compelling 3% zero-fee alternative to CdC Pro. The key question for 2026: can MetaMask's airdrop distributions (Rewards points) generate enough value to match Crypto.com's defined streaming rebates? Season 2 announcements will determine whether MetaMask's speculative upside becomes quantifiable reality.
Fee Breakdown
| Fee | Crypto.com | MetaMask |
|---|---|---|
| FX Fee | 0% | 0% |
| Annual Fee | TBD | TBD |
| ATM Fee | TBD | 2% |
Fees pulled from issuer documentation. Verify on the official site before applying.
Who Should Choose Crypto.com
The Prime is best suited for users who:
- Want up to 8% cashback on spending
- Need zero FX fees for international transactions
- Are based in GLOBAL
Who Should Choose MetaMask
The MetaMask Metal Card is best suited for users who:
- Want up to 3% cashback on spending
- Need zero FX fees for international transactions
- Are based in US, EEA, UK, GLOBAL
Our Verdict
**SpendNode's fee breakdown shows MetaMask's free 1% beats Crypto.com Plus (2%, $4.99/mo) at spending above $2,000/month due to Plus's $25/month cashback cap.** MetaMask earns $30/month uncapped versus Plus's $20.01 after subscription on $3,000/month spending. But Crypto.com Plus's 100% Spotify rebate ($156/year) makes the subscription profitable regardless of card spending - a user who pays for Spotify effectively gets Plus for free and earns cashback on top. At the Pro tier ($29.99/mo), Spotify + Netflix + Truth+ rebates (approximately $360-480/year) plus 4 annual lounge visits (approximately $160) create $520-640/year in perk value that MetaMask cannot match at any tier. For DeFi-native users who prioritize self-custody and cost simplicity, MetaMask wins outright. For lifestyle-oriented users who actually use streaming services and fly through airports, Crypto.com's perk ecosystem justifies its subscription.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has better cashback, Crypto.com or MetaMask?
Crypto.com offers up to 8% cashback compared to MetaMask's 3%. Actual rates depend on your spending tier and card variant.
Which card has lower fees?
Both charge 0% FX fee.
Is Crypto.com or MetaMask better for self-custody?
Both use custodial models. If self-custody is important, consider providers like Gnosis Pay or ether.fi.
Which card is available in more regions?
MetaMask is available in 4 regions (US, EEA, UK, GLOBAL) compared to Crypto.com's 1 region (GLOBAL). Always verify eligibility on the issuer's website.

